« Back to Index

Now You See It; Now You Don't
Make Metadata Disappear From Documents


by Kurt E. DeSoto


Occasionally I hear about a document attached to an e-mail sent to opposing counsel or electronically uploaded to the FCC that shows the authors' edits and sometimes their comments about the document while it was in draft. In some cases, the comments reveal the authors' strategies or acknowledge the weaknesses in their positions.

For example, a document sent by defendant's counsel with a final sentence intended as follows:

Section 415 of the Communications Act limits the plaintiffs' alleged damages
to a period of 2 years before the complaint was filed.

when opened by the recipient appears as:

Section 415 of the Communications Act limits the plaintiffs' alleged damages
to a period of two 2 years before the formal complaint was filed.
[Harry: doesn't the claim relate back to when the "informal" complaint was
filed, per FCC Rule 1.718, which would mean the period is
3 years in this case?]

How does this happen? Without getting into the technical tricks of the trade, let it suffice to say that certain word-processing and other software packages retain a record of the edits made to documents (called "metadata") that can sometimes magically re-appear in a document after it is received electronically by opposing counsel or the FCC. The types of metadata include:

- Tracked Changes/Revision Marks. Additions and deletions shown as redlined text

and strikethrough text.

- Comments. Electronic annotations indicated by colored highlights.

- Hidden Text. Text which may be displayed or hidden, depending on your Word

settings.

- Undo. Information about recent actions performed on the document.

- Document Properties. Information such as author, company, and creation date.

- Other. Variables, graphics, embedded spreadsheets, hyperlinks, etc.

This situation can be extremely embarrassing or, worse, constitute malpractice. (On the other side, some argue that it is an attorney's responsibility to zealously represent clients and actively look for such hidden information in documents received.)

To address this problem, many practitioners have instituted procedures to require each Word, WordPerfect, PowerPoint, Excel and other document to be "sanitized" by at least one of four methods before they are distributed electronically:

- Use the "delete" options in the pull-down menus of the software that created the

document (described by Microsoft in the URL cited above);

- Apply additional software designed specifically to "clean" documents (such as

Payne Metadata Assistant, available at http://www.payneconsulting.com);

- Run the document through a stand-alone scanner that outputs sanitized electronic

documents; or

- Convert the document to an image file (e.g., into Portable Document Format ("PDF")

or Tagged Image File Format ("TIFF)).

One technique which has become somewhat standard is to convert documents into Adobe PDF files. A PDF file is an electronic image (a "photograph" so to speak) of a document and, therefore, does not contain metadata. Moreover, it is not editable in Word (although it can be uploaded or sent by email). If the recipient of the electronic document does not need to make edits to the file, it may be preferable to send the document as a PDF file to avoid the transmission of metadata.

But did you know that there are two versions of Adobe's PDF software that offer different features? Depending on the type of document or need, one version might be preferable to another. But please note: while Adobe offers its Acrobat "reader" for free, it charges for the programs that "create" PDF files.

Adobe PDF Writer: PDF Writer is the basic version of Adobe's software for converting documents into PDF files and comes packaged as a "custom install" when loading Adobe Acrobat 6.0. It is then accessed by choosing "Create PDF" in the pull-down menu for the printer "Name" in the print window (i.e., after the user selects "File Menu, Print" or types "Ctrl + P").

PDF Writer creates acceptable electronic images for most text applications and usually reduces the file size compared to the source document. For example, a 10-page Word document of 600 KB might result in a 300 KB PDF file. Thus, you get not only the benefit of a sanitized document, but also a smaller file that is easier to e-mail as an attachment to recipients with slow connections or that use a service provider that limits size of attachments it will route.

On the other hand, PDF Writer will sometimes perform some hocus pocus on the spacing of a document or repaginate it so as to create artifacts or change the layout. It also does not convert very well detailed graphics, photographs, line art, or shaded images. In particular, I would not want to use PDF Writer for files that contain Encapsulated PostScript ("EPS") graphics. The result would look extremely pixilated or badly bitmapped.

Acrobat Distiller: Distiller is the higher-end version of Adobe's PDF software installed by default with Adobe Acrobat 6.0 and is accessed in the same manner as PDFWriter (except that you would choose "Acrobat Distiller" in the print window). It can also convert text documents, but is optimized to handle graphics-intensive documents, such as those created with programs like PageMaker, QuarkXPress, FrameMaker, Illustrator, FreeHand, CorelDraw or even Photoshop. This is because Distiller includes additional options not available with PDFWriter that allow users to control more precisely the resolution, compression, colors, and formatting of documents.

On the down side, Distiller operates somewhat more slowly than PDF Writer and requires a lot of RAM, especially for large documents. Moreover, in some modes, Distiller creates much larger files; unless the user changes the resolution settings, the same 10-page document that was 300 KB when converted using PDFWriter could be over a 1000 KB (or 1MB) when using Distiller.

For more information, Adobe posts a description and and other materials on PDF Writer and Distiller at http://www.adobe.com/support/salesdocs/10776.htm.

In sum, PDF Writer is best for simple text documents that do not contain graphics or when memory (RAM or disk space) is limited. It is also good to use when a document must be delivered via email over the Internet. I would recommend custom installing it on your computer along with Distiller. Distiller is preferable, however, when the quality of the image is critical, such as for high-end printing or when documents are graphics-intensive or contain photographs.

Now that you have a little more background regarding these programs to keep up your sleeve, perhaps it will be easier to choose which one is optimal to prevent being stained from what should have been "invisible ink."


Mr. DeSoto is an attorney at the law firm of Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP. He practices in the areas of wireless and wireline telecommunications, telephone company ratemaking, and equipment authorization. He previously worked in the FCC’s Common Carrier Bureau.


« Back to Index
Description of the FCBA

Officers and Executive Committee

Standing and Ad Hoc Committees

Chapters

FCBA Online Membership Directory

Labels for Purchase

Membership Directory

Audiocassettes of CLE Seminars

Job Bank Position Placement Form

Computers for Communications Practitioners